The domestication of the banana is the process that transformed fruits full of seeds into parthenocarpic seedless fruits that develop in the absence of pollination1 2 . The founding events took place in the humid tropical belt that extends from India to the Solomon Islands, the natural range of the wild species of bananas, which belong to the genus Musa. The earliest archaeological evidence of domesticated bananas is from Papua New Guinea and has been dated to at least 7,000 years before present3 .
Cultivated bananas were domesticated from a small subset of wild species of bananas. The best known ones are Musa acuminata and Musa balbisiana. Their genetic signature, especially Musa acuminata's, is found in the vast majority of cultivars known today. The ancestor of a group of bananas domesticated independently in the Pacific region, the Fei bananas, has not been identified.
Like human beings, wild bananas are diploid, that is they have two copies of each gene-bearing chromosome, one from each parent. Those with a genetic predisposition to parthenocarpy (the ability to produce a fruit in the absence of pollination) set the stage for the domestication of seedless edible bananas.
The potential to produce parthenocarpic fruits has been traced to genes present in Musa acuminata5 . Domestication for edibility most likely started with farmers transplanting the offshoots (suckers) of plants that were edible by virtue of having less seeds and more pulp. But since these plants were still fertile, they continued mating with other fertile banana plants. The latter could belong to the same or different subspecies of Musa acuminata, or to another species, Musa balbisiana.
Under the nomenclature system developed by Norman Simmonds and Kenneth Shepherd, those sexual events became the foundation of the AA and AB genome groups, the letter A standing in for acuminata and B for balbisiana.
Some bananas went on to produce triploid plants when one of the diploid parents normally passed on one copy of its genome, while the other contributed both copies (a phenomenon called meiotic restitution). This process produced three main genome groups : AAA, AAB and ABB.
Sterility is most likely due to a combination of structural and genetic factors6 . The structural factors are linked to matings between distant relatives (between different subspecies of Musa acuminata or between different species, mainly Musa acuminata and Musa balbisiana), as inheriting mismatched chromosomes made it difficult for the progeny to produce fertile ovules and pollen. But scientists also believe that farmers preferentially propagating the plants that produced fruits with the least seeds might have selected for genes that contribute to sterility7 . Triploidy made further sexual reproduction extremely unlikely.
From that point on, further diversity was produced by farmers propagating mutant plants that exhibited desirable traits. Diploid and triploid cultivars that are related to each other through a series of mutations are said to form a subgroup. Two examples are the Plantains of Africa and the East African highland bananas, which have upwards of 100 cultivars each. This diversity is the result of farmers propagating mutants of the triploid ancestors introduced to the continent.
Musapedia page on the nomenclature system for classifying cultivated bananas
Linnaeus’s banana legacy: How Linnaeus inadvertently muddled the taxonomy of bananas when he gave Latin binomials to two edible bananas, published 22 May 2019 in InfoMus@'s News and analysis section.
Modernizing Simmonds and Shepherd’s legacy: The nomenclature system specific to edible bananas is the only alternative to Latin binomials, but it needs tweaking and advocates to promote it, published 22 May 2019 in InfoMus@'s news and analysis section.
Special issue on the history of banana domestication in Ethnobotany Research & Applications.