Efforts to conserve Pacific bananas aim to raise awareness on their importance and shed light on their tangled history.
Botanists having established that the wild species Musa acuminata was one of the ancestors of bananas, Simmonds surmised that triploid bananas with acuminata-like traits (which he designated by the letters AAA) had been domesticated in Malaysia, where he said the species was at its most variable. It has since been shown that subspecies of acuminata not present in Malaysia were also implicated in the domestication of bananas. Since these subspecies occupy distinct geographic regions, such as the Philippines, Indonesia and New Guinea, plants must have been moved around in order to come into contact and hybridize. More difficult to pin point is where the diploid AAs came in contact with another wild species, Musa balbisiana, eventually giving rise to AB, AAB and ABB cultivars.
After his 1954 visit to what is now Papua New Guinea, Norman Simmonds, the author of seminal books on bananas, predicted that the area’s unusually high diversity of diploid bananas would soon be replaced by hardier and more productive triploid ones (see From diploids to triploids). His theory was that edible diploids had been introduced from southeast Asia early in the domestication process and owed their survival to the late arrival of triploid bananas.
Collecting missions conducted in 1988-89 did not bear out Simmonds’ prediction. The catalogue of material collected in PNG shows that, more than 30 years after his visit, edible diploids were still widespread, suggesting they were being actively conserved. Not only had they not disappeared, it also turned out that they had not been introduced either. It was eventually demonstrated that diploid, as well as triploid, bananas had been independently domesticated in the New Guinea area, along with the obviously local Fei bananas.
Meanwhile, accounts from the other side of the Pacific were mentioning groups of bananas designated Iholena, Maoli and Popoulu after the Hawaiian name of the most important cultivar in each group. Because the ancestors of the people who settled Polynesia are from southeast Asia, Simmonds believed that these ancient introductions were also from that part of the world. These Pacific plantains, as they came to be known, were eventually shown to also have originated in the New Guinea area.
Pacific plantains were not the only types of bananas introduced by Polynesian settlers. Fei bananas were also part of the voyage. For a while, it looked as if these once abundant fruit were irreversibly declining. In the early 2000s, however, reports of high levels of provitamin A carotenoids helped raise interest in their cultivation and conservation. A high-profile Go Local campaign in the Micronesian State of Pohnpei inspired other efforts to reduce dependence on imported foods by promoting and conserving local crops. For example, in the Solomon Islands the Kastom Gaden Association set up four banana collections with support from the Christensen Fund, while in Vanuatu, material collected on eight islands was planted in the Vanuatu Agricultural Research and Technical Centre's field station on the island of Santo.
A field collection for Pacific bananas
In French Polynesia, a field collection set up by the Ministry of Agriculture’s Maurice Wong has been selected as the host for the regional Pacific banana field collection funded by the Global Crop Diversity Trust. The field collection is working in partnership with the regional Pacific collection managed by the Secretariat of the Pacific Commission (SPC) in Fiji, which is conserving material received from member countries. The SPC maintains the plants in its care as tissue cultures and ensures that they are free of viruses before they are sent to French Polynesia. The regional collections are also linked with the international collection managed by Bioversity International at the International Transit Centre (ITC) in Belgium and are part of MusaNet.
Molecular markers have proved useful in exposing unexpected kinships. For example, they have shown that two important staples cultivated outside the banana’s primary centre of diversity, the African plantains and East African highland bananas, also trace part of their ancestry to the New Guinea area. The finding fits observations of PNG edible diploids exhibiting traits that anticipate these bananas.
Classifying these edible diploids will be a complicated undertaking, one of the reasons they are not currently included in the regional Pacific collection. Moreover, many of them are already in collections. The specimens collected during the 1988-89 collecting missions were planted at the PNG National Agricultural Research Institute’s field collection in Laloki and many of them have been duplicated at the ITC. Although they probably represent much of the diversity, it's unlikely that all the edible diploids were collected at the time, according to Jeff Daniells who participated in the missions. Unfortunately, when he went back to PNG in 2002, he noticed that introduced triploid varieties were more common in banana plantings. To stem the trend, he suggests enlisting farmers in what he calls community-based conservation sites. “The farmers”, he says, “could fund their conservation efforts from the sale of fruits and planting material and receive bonuses when they maintain or increase diversity in their plots”. Incentive schemes such as the payment for agrobiodiversity conservation services (PACS) being tested by Bioversity could be used to support the on-farm conservation of the less marketable cultivars.
Such a set up would help buy time to learn more about these bananas and find out why farmers have kept on growing them ... and maybe prevent Simmonds’ prediction from coming true.
The puzzling bananas of the Solomon Islands